On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 10:43 -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > On Jun 11, 2008, at 11:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > So are you saying that you think "MacPort" is a valid term? I was > > thinking it wasn't an accepted and/or used term. If folks think it > > is, I > > can stop flipping between using "MacPorts port" (mostly in intro > > parts) > > and "port" in the docs. It's not a really big deal though, except > > just to > > settle if the term "MacPort" is considered invalid usage or not. > > I'm not saying it's invalid, how about that? :-) > > Ultimately, I think it's like a nickname. You generally don't get to > pick your own nickname and, whether you like it or not, once you have > one it sticks to you like glue for the rest of your life. > > We're still just in that awkward phase where nobody has found a > nickname that really applies to the extent where everyone goes "Yes! > That's it!" and then continues to use that name regardless of what the > Powers That Be attempt to call it.
How about: Mmmm... port? _______________________________________________ macports-users mailing list macports-users@lists.macosforge.org http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/macports-users
