Hi,
How do you select fonts for Carbon and Aqua emacs ? I find that X has
nicer fixed pitch fonts than the native windows.
With the Carbon and Aqua emacs, I also have a hard time finding where
to place additional LISP code for tools that I find or write to extend
emacs. It is all very simple and stable in the X11 versions.
And, I can have X11 windows open from which I am running LaTeX or
other Unix programs and the focus shifts to and from an Emacs window
with the mouse location without have to click and change contexts each
time I switch among windows. Small thing but one that feels
irritating when it stops being possible.
Thanks,
Rob
On Feb 4, 2008, at 1:50 PM, Arnaud Delobelle wrote:
On 4 Feb 2008, at 15:17, Rob MacLeod wrote:
I totally agree about the desirability of an X11 port for its look
and feel. I have tried all the Carbon and Aqua ports I have come
across and none of them are superior (and most inferior) to the
tried and true.
I find it hard to understand how an X11 Emacs can be significantly
superior to Carbon Emacs or Aquamacs. I used X11 Emacs on GNU/
Linux, then Carbon Emacs on Tiger and now Aquamacs on Leopard and to
me there is no significant difference.
Carbon Emacs and Aquamacs are both excellent IMHO. Using Aquamacs I
get good copy/paste cooperation with other apps. I certainly don't
feel the need to run X11 just for Emacs, as to me its looks and feel
is about what's happening inside the window, not about what what the
window or menu bar looks like.
--
Arnaud
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users
_______________________________________________
macports-users mailing list
macports-users@lists.macosforge.org
http://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-users