might be on the wrong track here. i thought it may have been worth having our own wasm library for our clang, but it turns out this wasm stuff is not as big as the developers/effort make it sound.
i am getting kind of queasy going down the webassembly/firefox rabbit hole. the avatars are… let’s just say… um, imaginative. 🤘 Thanks, Gagan > On May 24, 2024, at 10:08 AM, Gagan Sidhu via macports-dev > <macports-dev@lists.macports.org> wrote: > > do we got it? > > tried a few a week ago and it seems like we don’t, as the firefox mach build > system would fail at the webassembly checks for clang. > > > Thanks, > Gagan >
