Good to know for next time.
I expect 312 should be fine as well, although I haven't tested it.
Thanks
On February 14, 2024 2:02:07 AM EST, MacPorts <nore...@macports.org> wrote:
>#69334: py-simplekml: Support newer Python versions
>---------------------------+----------------------
> Reporter: dershow | Owner: (none)
> Type: enhancement | Status: new
> Priority: Normal | Milestone:
> Component: ports | Version:
>Resolution: | Keywords: haspatch
> Port: py-simplekml |
>---------------------------+----------------------
>Changes (by ryandesign):
>
> * keywords: => haspatch
> * type: update => enhancement
>
>
>Comment:
>
> You should attach a diff, not a complete Portfile, so that we can see what
> the changes are (or, even better, submit a pull request). Looks like they
> are:
>
> {{{#!diff
> diff --git a/python/py-simplekml/Portfile b/python/py-simplekml/Portfile
> index f15120610d5..624a44bfdd9 100644
> --- a/python/py-simplekml/Portfile
> +++ b/python/py-simplekml/Portfile
> @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ checksums rmd160
> 9455e10d40c8b53bdb20d92bd9d36746d9d1f2df \
> sha256
> cda687be2754395fcab664e908ebf589facd41e8436d233d2be37a69efb1c536 \
> size 52999
>
> -python.versions 37
> +python.versions 37 38 39 310 311
>
> if {${name} ne ${subport}} {
> depends_build-append \
> }}}
>
> Any reason why you didn't list `312` as well?
>
>--
>Ticket URL: <https://trac.macports.org/ticket/69334#comment:1>
>MacPorts <https://www.macports.org/>
>Ports system for macOS
--Adam
