On Mon, 28 Aug 2023, Blair Zajac wrote:
To reduce friction for reviewers, what’s the link to the PR?
At least it included the port name, which often isn't the case. It shouldn't be necessary to follow the PR link (when provided) just to see what port is being referenced.
It might not even be an unreasonable practice to include the output of "port info --description <port>" in such emails.
Fred Wright
