On Feb 4, 2021, at 11:26, Ken Cunningham wrote: > wait, I could have missed the issue...if meson is now adding a default > argument to all checks that means it can never build anything with the > default compilers on <10.10, that would be something we should consider > fixing in meson, even if upstream doesn't want to. > > So if testing shows that all builds on 10.7 -10.9 of meson ports are broken, > then yeah, that's different, sure. That sounds like what Craig is saying: that meson is now adding a compiler flag that old compilers don't understand. Meson should check whether a compiler supports a flag before it adds it. We should not be responsible for fixing this; the developers of meson should.
- Re: Meson 0.56.2 and Python39 --> dav1d failing Ken Cunningham
- Re: Meson 0.56.2 and Python39 --> dav1d failing Joshua Root
- Re: Meson 0.56.2 and Python39 --> dav1d failin... Ken Cunningham
- Re: Meson 0.56.2 and Python39 --> dav1d fa... Ken Cunningham
- Re: Meson 0.56.2 and Python39 --> dav1... Joshua Root
- Re: Meson 0.56.2 and Python39 -->... Craig Treleaven
- Re: Meson 0.56.2 and Python39 --... Ken Cunningham
- Re: Meson 0.56.2 and Python39 --... Ken Cunningham
- Re: Meson 0.56.2 and Python39 --> dav1d failing Ken Cunningham
- Re: Meson 0.56.2 and Python39 --> dav1d failing Ken Cunningham
- Re: Meson 0.56.2 and Python39 --> dav1d failin... Ryan Schmidt
- Re: Meson 0.56.2 and Python39 --> dav1d fa... Ken Cunningham
- Re: Meson 0.56.2 and Python39 --> dav1... Ryan Schmidt
- Re: Meson 0.56.2 and Python39 -->... Craig Treleaven
- Re: Meson 0.56.2 and Python39 --> dav1d failing Ken Cunningham
- Re: Meson 0.56.2 and Python39 --> dav1d failin... Ken Cunningham