Re: port "cask" -- installing prebuilt binaries

[Ken Cunningham]

> On Aug 6, 2020, at 12:28 PM, Herby G <herby.gil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > so far, name-suffix is winning on all fronts...with no downsides yet.
> 
> I don't plan on pushing the issue, but I have to say that I don't agree.
> 

I originally suggested both, and got no purchase on either, so had to push one 
of them to get some reaction :> I get the feeling if I had pushed the category 
idea this morning, we’d all be talking now about how the name method would be 
so much better :>



I would use the name — it’s just so much easier. I can see what’s installed 
when someone posts a ticket by the name they used. I can search for them. I can 
remember the command to search for them. I can tell someone else how to search 
for them. It doesn’t conflict with the non-binary port if one exists.

But truly -- that is really the least of the worries here.

So long as:

The binary install can be EASILY recognized by all.
You can FIND them all easily, and delete them.

I don’t care.

Ken