Hi,

>> However, the person who reported the error to me claimed he only used `port 
>> select` and didn't create the symlink himself. I didn't push him to know how 
>> nor did I try myself, but if indeed `port select` allows this calling it a 
>> "user error" is a bit unjust. You cannot expect every user to know that 
>> plain `python` should resolve to a v2 interpreter (I also didn't), and `port 
>> select` shouldn't be able to break that rule.
> 
> From my point of view, yes, MacPorts allows the user to commit this error, 
> and we should fix MacPorts to prevent such an error, or at least warn the 
> user about it, hence the ticket whose URL I mentioned earlier.

Please note, the comment in that ticket referring to the PEP is 3 years old, 
and the PEP itself was last modified in 2015.

The PEP itself notes that 

"It is anticipated that there will eventually come a time where the third party 
ecosystem surrounding Python 3 is sufficiently mature for this recommendation 
to be updated to suggest that the python symlink refer to python3 rather than 
python2.”

I am not saying day that is now, but given python 2.7 is EOL next year (last 
time I checked) I think it is at this point less of an error for a user to have 
‘python’ point to ‘python3’ than it was when that ticket was opened.

For me, we should allow ‘port select python’ to select a 3.x version, but at 
the moment issue a warning to the user if they do this they might have problems.

Also none of what a user might or might not do with port select should have any 
bearing on how any given port works. If it does, it is a bug in that port. 
ports should be written to, if they are sensitive to the python version used, 
explicitly configure their builds to use a specific macports python version, 
and not rely on whatever the environment provides.

Chris

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to