Sure. I could at least edit the old port locally to install in the future. I think a gdal variant doing it without the extra port would be a workable solution. Thanks.
Jason > On May 24, 2018, at 1:56 PM, Vincent Habchi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don’t understand the licensing requirements, but I find this to be a >> convenient port for getting Mr. Sid support with the MacPorts gdal. I find >> it useful and hope that it can remain as long as it is appropriate. > > In any case, the support wouldn’t be removed. But, like I did with ECW API, > MacPort’s official policy might force me to delete the port. You would then > have to install the SDK manually in a predetermined place – thereby accepting > the license – and the GDAL port variant would link against it. > > V. >
