> On 25 Apr 2018, at 7:08 pm, Perry E. Metzger <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 11:47:21 -0500 Ryan Schmidt > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Apr 25, 2018, at 11:23, Chris Jones wrote: >> >>> I don't think there is any need to re-invent our own system here. >>> There is an already standard why of dong this, which is to >>> declare the request as 'Work In Progress'. This is trivially done >>> by adding 'WIP' to the start of the PR title. >> >> Wouldn't it be more appropriate to use labels, rather than >> inserting a label into the title? >> > > I tend to think labels are better as well.
Labels are fine. A label can be used to mark a MR as WIP. my point is we should mark them in a standard way, that triggers github to correctly treat the MR as ‘work in progress’ the same way as every other project on github does... > > Perry > -- > Perry E. Metzger [email protected]
