On Apr 20 09:50:50, jerem...@macports.org wrote: > > > On Apr 18, 2018, at 21:17, Ryan Schmidt <ryandes...@macports.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 18, 2018, at 06:47, Jan Stary wrote: > > > >>>> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/607997ade7f0bd99c7a7297d7a49ae79442b705f > >> > >>>> aqua/qt5/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> aqua/qt55/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> aqua/qt56/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> aqua/qt57/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> aqua/qt58/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> aqua/qt59/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> databases/msodbcsql/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> devel/cargo/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> devel/fbthrift/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> devel/folly/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> devel/grpc/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> devel/lua-luasec/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> devel/qca/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> devel/wangle/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> finance/bitcoin/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> math/octave/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> net/libstrophe/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> net/mosquitto/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> net/profanity/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> net/qpid-proton/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> net/snort/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> science/ldas-tools-framecpp/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> textproc/html-xml-utils/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> www/phantomjs/Portfile | 2 +- > >>>> 24 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > >> > >> Thank you! > >> > >> If I am reading the syntax right, path: as opposed to lib: means > >> that only lib/libssl.dylib (relative path) under $prefix will be used. > >> https://guide.macports.org/chunked/reference.dependencies.html > >> Is that intended? > > > > Yes, that is correct and intentional. > > > > > >> How was this "misc" subset selected? Was it simply the missing ones? > >> It seems that now all ports use this, with the following exceptions: > >> > >> net/qpid-proton (+openssl) port:openssl > >> python/py-grpcio/Portfile: port:openssl > >> > >> Where these intentionally left out? > > > > They weren't left out. qpid-proton was changed, but then subsequently > > reverted, for possibly invalid reasons: > > > > https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/1531#issuecomment-379178034 > > > > py-grpcio was not included in Jeremy's commit because it didn't exist at > > the time; it was added 3 days later: > > > > https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/1536 > > > > > >> Also, the following require a specific version: > >> > >> devel/libpdel lib:libssl.0.9:openssl > >> mail/qpopper lib:libssl.0:openssl > >> mail/sylpheed-devel (+ssl) lib:libssl.0.9:openssl > >> net/jabber lib:libssl.0.9:openssl > >> www/links1 (+ssl) lib:libssl.0.9:openssl > >> > >> Were these also intentinally left out? (And should > >> ports that require openssl 0.9 be killed with fire?) > > > > It seems unlikely that those ports require openssl 0.9 specifically, but > > rather that those ports have not been updated since we started recommending > > the use of port: dependencies instead of lib: dependencies a decade or more > > ago. > > Yeah, the intention was just to update all of them consistently. It's true > that some of those ports might not work with libressl, but IMO it would be > better to have a report of the build failure that we can act on to fix than > to have port err out because we missed something.
Absolutely. > I haven't personally tried every single port (since actually some of them > have dependencies that fail to build on my system which I haven't worked > through) > Thanks for pointing these out. I'll take a look through them. I removed them in https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/pull/1602 but Joshua brought qpopper, jabber and links1 back, with FreeBSD patches (see recent commits). I believe they should all go, because they are simply obsolete. For example, we go to web.archive.org now (as a $hompage!) to get the nonexistent content of www.eudora.com/products/unsupported/qpopper/ NB: "web.archive.org", "/unsupported/". Why do we want this? > grep doesn't find everything unless you know what you're looking for ;) The above is indeed a result of a naive grep for "libssl.0" Thanks for looking into this. Jan
