On Apr 16, 2018, at 05:56, Marius Schamschula wrote:

> On Apr 16, 2018, at 2:42 AM, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
> 
>> On Apr 15, 2018, at 06:25, Marius Schamschula wrote:
>> 
>>> Marius Schamschula (Schamschula) pushed a commit to branch master
>>> in repository macports-ports.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/12a01d50a2872f2d1375bb858c091b847b395591
>>> 
>>> commit 12a01d50a2872f2d1375bb858c091b847b395591
>>> 
>>> Author: Marius Schamschula
>>> AuthorDate: Sun Apr 15 06:24:31 2018 -0500
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    TeXShop3: mark as obsolete, replaced by TeXShop4
>> 
>> The TeXShop port still mentions that users of newer systems should use the 
>> TeXShop3 port instead. I guess that should be changed to recommend the 
>> TeXShop4 port now.
> 
> I’ll fix that.
> 
>> I'm surprised that TeXShop4 4.00 works on Mavericks and newer, when TeXShop3 
>> 3.99 required Sierra or newer. If they really did re-add compatibility with 
>> older systems, that's great.
> 
> This is based on the TeXShop web site, not any local tests. They do say that 
> Yosemite or higher is strongly recommended. I guess Mavericks may have some 
> issues.

The web site doesn't appear to mention what OS versions it can *build* on. It 
just mentions what OS versions it's "for". Previous versions would have run on 
earlier OS versions, but required a newer SDK to compile, and judging by the 
fact that TeXShop4 only built on our High Sierra builder, I guess that's still 
the same. I have been working on adding ports for older SDKs, so maybe then we 
can fix this situation.


>> It's a little weird that you have the TeXShop 2.47 port for Snow Leopard and 
>> older, and the TeXShop 4.00 port for Mavericks and newer, and no TeXShop 
>> port that works on Lion or Mountain Lion.
> 
> I was considering leaving TeXShop3 for Lion, but that would have meant adding 
> epoch, as the currently supported version for Lion is 3.65.

Right. Or you could combine everything into a single TeXShop port, and offer 
different TeXShop versions to different OS versions as needed.

Reply via email to