On Feb 4, 2018, at 20:21, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 4 February 2018 at 16:09, Ken Cunningham wrote: >> Please not more portgroups, tho. > > Why not?
They would be rather similar to one another. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_repeat_yourself We should think about how this will work if and when it is integrated into MacPorts base and not a portgroup. I think starting with configure.cc_std and configure.cxx_std might work well. >> How about we just move up that clang floor as time goes by? > > I'd actually be in favor of more explicit dependency usage. Either > creating a new portgroup or a single generic one called > compiler_features or whatnot.
