On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 09:59:28PM -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote:
On May 21, 2017, at 21:50, Zero King <l...@macports.org> wrote: Yes. For LibreSSL users libtls.dylib already exists so libtls won't be installed with this variant and for OpenSSL users libtls can be installed. Most users already have one of them installed or would stick to the default (openssl), so I think it's safe to use depends_lib-append path:lib/libtls.dylib:libtls in the variant.We shouldn't have two ports that install the same software. Sounds like libtls should provide the library, and libressl should depend on it. The deactivate hack will have to be used to make that work.
I'd prefer to keep the libressl port contents untouched. openssl and libressl install the same software too. @jeremyhu is the maintainer so it's up to him to 1. not add the libtls port 2. add it and keep libressl as is 3. separate libtls from libressl -- Best regards, Zero King Don't trust the From address.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
