> On Jan 18, 2017, at 04:23, René J.V. Bertin <rjvber...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there an existing way to create a kind of nested destroot, where the
> installed port ends up *unmodified* under say ${prefix}/test?
>
> Looking at the Portfile guide I think that the only way to accomplish this
> reliably is in a post-destroot step (a post-post-destroot to be really sure),
> in which everything under ${destroot} is moved into ${destroot}${prefix}/test
> ?
>
> If so, am I right that post-destroot blocks declared in/as `variant foo ... {
> post-destroot{ } }` will be executed *after* all post-destroot blocks defined
> in the normal Portfile scope?
I believe you're right that variant code is executed after other code in the
portfile.
