Am 13.03.2014 um 22:57 schrieb STF <lapsap7+...@gmail.com>: > On 7 March 2014 16:25, Stephan Witt <st.w...@gmx.net> wrote: > Am 07.03.2014 um 16:12 schrieb STF <lapsap7+...@gmail.com>: > > > On 7 March 2014 05:10, aparsloe <apars...@clear.net.nz> wrote: > > > > I've never tried installing the LyX bundle. I've always installed MiKTeX > > first and then LyX -- and without problems. Recently I installed the 64-bit > > version of MiKTeX 2.9 on a new(ish) 64-bit Windows 7 computer without > > problems, [...deleted] > > > > Oh, for information: I have just tried basic-miktex-2.9.5105-x64.exe in XP > > Pro 64-bit. Guess what. It crashed on first trial. LOL > > Oh, for information: this is the LyX users list. And not the MiKTeX users > list… > > Oh, for information, my answer was a reply to a previous mail. If you have > anything against MiKTeX, you should have answered to that mail, not mine.
I don't have anything against MiKTeX. I had something against "LOL". > And oh, for information, my answer is very useful to *LyX* users because it > tells them that installing *LyX* in XP Pro 64-bit could potentially fail if > they are using the bundle. But probably you're more concentrated on kicking > off apparent non-LyX discussion than thinking further its implication. No. I didn't like the tone of the discussion. Stephan
