On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:34 AM, stefano franchi <stefano.fran...@gmail.com > wrote:
> I am not sure starting to use Jurabib is such a great choice. Jurabib > is basically a dead project, as far as I know. It would better to > start with biblatex. > Thanks Stefano - I have tried biblatex and just can't get it to work. If I was still using Linux I'm sure it would be easy, but running LyX 2.0.2 on Windows with MikTeX 2.9, I just can't get bibtex/biber to spit out anything. I'm having the same result as this person: http://www.latex-community.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=11317 (i.e. bold keys in place of citations, and no bibliography printing out). I downloaded and updated the Test LyX files the person there managed to get working and can't even get them working on my installation - just prints BIB keys and no bibliography. So after an hour of trying to get biblatex working in place of jurabib, I'm down an hour on a tight deadline and still no closer to solving the only prob I have with jurabib which is the bibliography style :) Would be nice if LyX just supported biblatex natively... If anyone is interested, the LaTeX log is showing me the following when I try and output the PDF file: Package biblatex Info: Trying to load bibliographic data... Package biblatex Info: ... file 'Literature_Review_Draft.bbl' not found. No file Literature_Review_Draft.bbl. LaTeX Warning: Citation 'abs_labour' on page 2 undefined on input line 39. (The LyX file is called Literature_Review_Draft.bbl and is in one of my Documents folders. The BIB file is called ITMPResearch.bib and is in C:\Users\brett\AppData\Roaming\MikTeX\2.9, which is a MiKTeX-maintained root directory). Thanks in advance Brett.
