On 2012-02-19, Georg Baum wrote: > Guenter Milde wrote: >> On 2012-02-15, Georg Baum wrote: >>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> Unfortunately I know next to nothing about use_non_tex_fonts. After >>> reading the code and user guide a bit I see that using xetex is only >>> possible if use_non_tex_fonts is true, so your patch looks fine. >> It is the other way round: using xetex or luatex is also possible without >> use_non_tex_fonts (which actually means use_fontspec). OTOH, with >> use_non_tex_fonts True, it one of xetex or luatex must be used. > For luatex I agree, but for xetex I don't believe that you are right. Do you > have an example .lyx file, where use_non_tex_fonts is false, but xetex is > still used? If you are right, the patch introduces a regression. Just take a "normal" file (with use_non_tex_fonts False) and select one of File>Export>LaTeX (XeTex) File>Export>PDF (XeTeX) View>Other Formats>PDF (XeTeX) The exported LaTeX with my somewhat outdated LyX-svn is %% LyX 2.1.0svn created this file. For more info, see http://www.lyx.org/. %% Do not edit unless you really know what you are doing. \documentclass[english]{article} \usepackage[T1]{fontenc} \usepackage{babel} \usepackage{xunicode} \begin{document} Test \end{document} and compiles fine with XeTeX. Günter
