On 24 October 2011 17:54, Manolo Martínez wrote: > Paul, > > You need indeed to use the mumeric option, but then, when compiled, the > .bst > takes care of the (author, year) stuff. Why is this not acceptable? > > Attached your test.lyx (with another citation; apparently my copy of > test.bib > is different!) and the pdf I get. > > Manolo > On 10/24/11 at 02:54pm, Paul Clist wrote: > > Manolo, > > > > I've attached a short lyx document. I've dropped everything from the > > preamble, and (as requested in the aea documentation) changed LaTeX font > > encoding to “None (no fontenc)”. I used the test.bib file in this > example, > > and attached the aea .cls and .bst files. > > > > Thanks > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > On 24 October 2011 13:10, Manolo Martínez wrote: > > > > > On 10/24/11 at 12:51pm, Paul Clist wrote: > > > > > > > > simple, but I have searched high and low to no avail. Using the > aea.cls > > > (for > > > > the American Economic Review) I have problems if I try to use either > > > Natbib > > > > or Jurabib, i.e. only the default bibliography works. > > > > > > > > - With Natbib I get the error messages "Command x already > defined", > > > where > > > > x is /harvardurl, /harvarditem and so on. > > > > - With Jurabib the error message is "command \citeyear already > > > defined". > > > > > > > Is there anything bibliography-related in the preamble of the document? > > > Could you post a short lyx file with which you get the error? > > > > > > Manolo > > > -- >
Manolo, Thanks for the response. I problem with this is that the only choice is (Anon. 1967): you can't choose Anon (1967) or even bibliography only (which would cut down on the amount of work for a work around). It would essentially mean having to not use a bibliography package and do it all by hand - not an ideal solution by any means. Best, Paul
