On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 5:04 AM, Julio Rojas <jcredbe...@gmail.com> wrote: > It works, only not it seems not to work with Natbib. From apacite's manual: > I consider natbib as the de facto standard with which other packages should > be compatible. > Unfortunately, apacite is still not entirely compatible with natbib. The > main incompatibility is that > diļ¬erent citation commands are used, so that it is not possible to use the > same document with > natbib or apacite. > Regards.
You may consider switching to biblatex (from standard bibtex) and using the biblatex-apa style (http://www.ctan.org/pkg/biblatex-apa). Biblatex is not completely integrated with Lyx yet, so you may have to write a few commands in ERT (i.e. pure Latex), but it works fairly well once you get the hang of it. Look at the wikipages to get started (http://wiki.lyx.org/BibTeX/Biblatex). I switched to using biblatex a couple of years ago and have no regrets---it is much more flexible and powerful than bibtex. Moreover, it is clearly the way forward for managing bibliographies in latex/Lyx. It is actively developed, with an increasing user base, etc. If you are just starting in Lyx/Latex, it may be wise to learn how to use it. However, I have no experience with biblatex-apa. You may want to look at the manual to see if it fits your needs. Cheers, Stefano
