Nikos Alexandris wrote: > > It is (if I am not wrong) article-based. Maybe not after all... ? [...]
Richard Heck: > I thought it would be for theorems, etc, but perhaps it is not required: > Maybe the style already defines some of these environments. > > About the layout you posted: a title, two Section(s) with some standard > > text gives the following error: > > "LaTeX Error: Command \proof already defined." > > Does this relate to... well, the "theorems-ams" module? > Probably. Try removing that. Already did so and get the same error. After looking in "tRES2e.cls" I see no line that contains the string "Load" and all "article" strings are actually "articletype". I hope that the document does really work upon an existing class... (hmm?) Nikos
