oh, i didn't know that's possible! hmm, that would solve the update thing! niko
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 2:47 PM, BH <bewih...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Christian Ridderström > <christian.ridderst...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, Niko Schwarz wrote: > > > >> need to tar/untar anything. What was REALLY difficult was the .module I > >> had written for the document. It cannot be accessed by a relative path; > it > >> needs to be inserted directly into the lyx tree. On OSX, I have to redo > the > >> module installation procedure on every update. > > > > Have you reported this? At the very least it sounds like a feature > request > > that you don't want to have to use absolute paths to .module. > > Niko - > > Are you putting modules in the right place? If you put them in > ~/Library/Application Support/LyX-1.6/layouts, then you should have no > problems with updates. > > Bennett >
