> Pavel Sanda wrote: >>> I would think so. The main git repo could be easily hosted in a number of >>> locations. >> whats the improvement over svn? > > Cloning a git repository is as easy as a snap and we wouldn't need to > maintain an svn server that goes down every month.
i fail to see why this is a problem with svn. there are svn services around too. we still need web pages, bugzila, wiki, mails working, so some remote git repo is not of much help. pavel
