On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Paul A. Rubin wrote:
I can't translate the [EMAIL PROTECTED]@symbol2 thing, but we had a discussion about the vagaries of \textservicemark back in February (http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg62336.html). Does this imply that the workaround you found acceptable then (\textsuperscript{SM}) is no longer sufficient?
Paul, No, the workaround still works. I would, however, like to learn why symbol cannot be produced by the package in which it's defined. There should be a reason known by some LaTeX guru, and I'd like to expand my knowledge by having that reason explained to me. Rich -- Richard B. Shepard, Ph.D. | Integrity Credibility Applied Ecosystem Services, Inc. | Innovation <http://www.appl-ecosys.com> Voice: 503-667-4517 Fax: 503-667-8863
