On Thu, 10 May 2007 11:31:01 +0200
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>> "Micha" == Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> What kind of definitions? Is that a real english document?
>
> Micha> It is a real English document which is collaborated on at the
> Micha> latex level so I'd rather keep the original definitions. In
> Micha> this case for mathematics, \R for \mathds{R} and \H for
> Micha> \mathbf{H}
>
> Hmm, does babel override that?
>
Babel defines \R and \L for RTL or LTR text and it also defines \H but I don't
recall exactly what for, something internal for hebrew.
> Micha> Also, I haven't checked the XeTeX compatability yet, but AFAIK
> Micha> it doesn't mix with babel (or at least I don't need babel for
> Micha> hebrew documents with XeTeX)
>
> I *think* this is worked on.
>
One thing that was solved (at least according to the list) is the encoding
issue (to allow using utf8 without the encoding package)
I don't know about this.
> JMarc
>
