At least it should be given a less "cryptical" name. "TeX Information" is not very good.
On 4/17/07, Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Richard Heck wrote: > This has happened before, I believe, and been asked about on the list. I > don't know if 1.5.svn is different. No. > If not, it should be. Personally, I agree. However, the argument for not doing so was that the texmf scanning can take rather long time, which will slow down reconfiguring. Jürgen
-- ------------------------------------------------- Julio Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
