Steve Litt wrote: > Here's one reason. Throughout all my books I have a graphic that > represents binary search. It's used several times per book, in several > chapters. If I named them all descriptively, they'd clash. But if I named > them both descriptively AND according to where they occur, that problem's > solved.
Yes, that is a good reason to add something section related to the label. But why should that be the section number, and why not the section name? Georg