Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > ...[T]he dbj file is confusing for the unexperienced. > For instance, where is the line which selects for article > > Title. Journal > I have now > Title Journal (without .) > > Same with book > > or for incollection: > In: editors (capital and :) > instead of > in editors There are limits to how much you can customize your bibliography style by playing with the .dbj files: It only lets you select among what its options permit. To do more customization, you may need to delve into the generated .bst file itself. These changes are trivial if you know what you're doing, but the language used in the .bst files takes a little (ahem!) getting used to.
Richard
