Sorry, more specifically, I get this error when trying to run lyx:

exception caught:
boost::filesystem::is_directory:
"J:\MSYS\home\Angus\LyX\devel\build\installprefix\Resources\locale":
the device is not ready
Assertion triggered in void boost::throw_exception<const
std::exception&> by failing check "false" in file ../../src/boost.C:29

On 3/4/06, Stacia Hartleben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't get this version to work. Do I need to build the dictionaries
> to make it work? I tried doing sh configure and it still won't load. I
> uninstalled the old version of LyX too to make sure nothing was
> interfering.
>
> On 3/4/06, Stephen Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Stacia Hartleben" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Sven Schreiber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "Lars Gullik Bjønnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 04, 2006 5:33 PM
> > Subject: Re: Prerelease 6 of 1.4.0
> >
> >
> > I agree completely - I was trying to figure out how to compile it for
> > windows but couldn't...But I would very much like to test the new
> > version.
> >
> > -------------------------------  Some Windows information.
> >
> > This is not quite as new but might be useful for
> > testing until there is a newer binary,
> >
> > http://wiki.lyx.org/uploads/Windows/LyX140pre/lyx-1.4.0pre_win32_setup_v2.exe
> >
> > It was provided by Angus Leeming. To get spellchecking to work,
> > the newly downloaded dictionary (aspell5-6.0-0)goes in
> > C:\Aspell\lib\aspell-0.60 and it has to be built. It might be better to
> > ignore spellchecking until they finish re-building the newer dicts and
> > put them into packages which they intend to do for Lyx1.4.0 proper.
> >
> > I also copied the contents ~\aspell6\aspell-0.60.4\data (iso-8859-1.cset
> > etc.)
> > into the folder, C:\Aspell\lib\aspell-0.6; the rest of the installation went
> > smoothly and the problem that some of us had of typing "sh configure"
> > again at the end of the installation has been resolved.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Stephen
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to