Helge Hafting ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Not really. The win32 version of lyx does not in any way make it a > more "serious" solution. More accessible of course, but no > more serious.
Who said that? Me? Marc? > Now, if we're making wishes - scratch the bloated gtk and > go for fltk. Lightweight they way it should be, and it has > nice stuff like unicode and antialiasing anyway. I just moved kde --> gnome and do not understand what would be the advantage of fltk over gtk and/or Qt? Multi-platform? I was thinking about that in the time when I proposed wxWidgets as a one multi-platform kit, but today I'm more for GTK+. However, I also understand that we won't see GTK and/or GNOME port soon, but nobody can prevent me dreaming :-) > It probably won't happen though - lack of manpower as always. Well, we can still express wishes and maybe some soul(s) jump in to make a GNOME port. Many GNOME libs are available for Mac OS and arriving for Win32 (for those still needing that OS :-) Sincerely, Gour p.s. Unfortunately, my time-for-contributing-to-the-open-source-community is already slotted (e.g. gtk2hs) and I do not posess skill for coding in C++ (trying to learn Haskell for other stuff). -- Registered Linux User | #278493 GPG Public Key | 8C44EDCD
