Ok I know it is bad to start a new thread but I think a number of things need to be listed so that people (me included) aren't confused.
 
I am using
 
\usepackage{palatino}
 
This provides Type 1 (non-bitmap) fonts.
 
The dvi file is perfect - to create the dvi it makes its fonts from .vf and .pk files (hence the splash about 'making fonts'). It gets it information from folders such as /Adobe/
 
dvips produces a perfect ps file.
 
However both dvipdfm and pdflatex produce files like the one attached (please look at it as this is the problem). It looks fine at most magnifications but try 99% (fine) and then 100% (what is happening to the end of the T and top of the D).  Also if you look at the fonts it is using they are URW versions of palatino called palladio.
 
So my points are these
 
1)If it was a bitmap problem it would mess up all characters   
 
2)the dvi and pdf files are using different sources for the fonts
 
3)it only happens in Adobe
 
so...........................
 
apart from Reader being terrible at scaling why does the dvi and pdf files use different fonts? Can I get pdflatex to use the adobe set of fonts?
 
I know it is triviasl that a T and a D look bad at one magnification but it got me thinking and the more I have investigated the font world the more chaotic it seems.
 
Geoff

Attachment: pdf1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

Reply via email to