Georg Baum wrote: >> >>But I still have no clue on why the pgf-thing failed. > > > It simply looks like pgf is not using [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please file this as a > bug > to the author of pgf. IMHO all LaTeX packages that include some external > stuff should honour [EMAIL PROTECTED] And if it does not use it it should be > documented.
Well I discovered a "todo" file in the official pgf-distribution on ctan which says: "9) Honor \graphicspath command." Is that the same thing? > The documentation says that "\includegraphics is designed better than > pgfbaseimage", but some examplkes of the advantages would be nice. > No idea here.
