Herbert Voss wrote:
>>>>Easier than this gnuplot file which is exported to XFig by my
>>>>gnuplot2fig.sh script? Sorry, Herbert. I think I win that one ;-)
>>
>>>ok, here we go
>>>Attached the pdf with your and my image ... :-)

>> Nice! Well done!

>> I guess that the tweaking needed to get the two to appear more
>> similar is minimal and straightforward?

>> Anyway, the bet was that that you could do it more easily than 20
>> lines of gnuplot script, so let's see your source ;-)

> additional all the lines of your other scripts ...
> addtional all the strokes in xfig
> additional ... :-)

:-)
Done once and forgotten about.

Actually, I'm very impressed by your .tex file, but if you *really*
want to get new users then I can't think of a better way than adding
a PSTricks export option to gnuplot. Adding a gnuplot output driver
is pretty easy (I've messed with the XFig one myself).

Yes, I'm serious ;-)

> More serious: the advantage is, that all these font stuff
> when using gnuplot->xfig->latex is no more a (real) problem
> and that you are able to do some changes to the output
> always "on the fly".

I don't see that as a big issue. That's what Makefiles are for.

> the only new macro is \getErrorBar, but I had an existing one
> for two error values +/-.
> http://tug.org/PSTricks/main.cgi?file=examples#dotError
> 
> The other plots could be done with pstricks-add.

Angus


Reply via email to