On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 12:30 +0100, Simon Bock wrote: > Martijn Brouwer wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 10:09 +0100, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > >>I was asked by a colleague how to handle a MedLine search in order to > >>insert > >>selected references into pybliographer before piping them into lyx. > > > > I do not know much about Medline searches, but pybliographer can handle > > medline databases. Pybliographer is really great software, especially > > Sure, I did searches and they come back as expected. That's cool. > But since I don't manage to get only one result back, I'm confronted > with e.g. 10 entries cluttering my database. > It is not clear to me want you want to achieve. Note that searching does not change your database. I just shows only the entries that match your search criteria.
> That is what I use, but I did not manage to have multiple windows / > reference databases in it. > What I know from the M$ world is one window to do your searches in, one > window with your reference database, and you drag the relevant article > out of the search results into your database. > Can this be achieved with pybliographic? > You want to store your search results in a separate database file? As far as I know it is not possible. Why would you like this? If you want to make a database file with all citations used in some article you can use the "pybcompact" script included in the package. > > I have a 150+ article database (bibtex format) for my PhD thesis and > > with pybliographic I can conveniently manage it, search articles and > > Maybe I am just stupid - but isn't your bitex database cluttered with > search results after a search? You can easily remove a by right clicking on it search in the search window. You can also perform a new search within the results of a previous search by selecting the old search before entering a new one. > Thank you for your opinion. > Best Regards > Simon >
