G. Milde schrieb:
> On 20.09.04, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>> G. Milde wrote:
>>
>>> On 17.09.04, Helge Hafting wrote:
>
>
>
>>>> ... would it be ok to simply replace pslatex with the better alternative,
>>>> or would we get angry protests from:
>>>> * People who have pslatex but not the alternative (if any)
>>>> * People who want their old documents to appear just so, and object
>>>> to anything that changes fonts in _existing_ documents?
>>>
>>>
>>> Keep pslatex but put it in a lower position. This way it is clear not to be
>>> first choice but will still be used for existing documents.
>>>
>>> Changing fonts can be a big issue and it could become a long cumbersome
>>> search to find out why my carefully crafted page layout got completely out
>>> of sync.
>>
>>
>> nonsense here! Look what pslatex loads and compare it with
>> the replacement, which I posted more than once.
>
>
>
> I just compared Document>Font pslatex with
> Document>Font Default + preamble \usepackage{lmodern}
>
> The translated document has 32 vs. 30 pages and floats appear at totally
> different positions. An automatic replacement would break my docs.
you are comparing two different things, pslatex has nothing to do with latin modern fonts.
> I would object to documents defining Font pslatex to be typeset with lmodern
> automatically.
see above, when a user wants times you can say take lm fonts.
> However, I would like lmodern to appear in the drop down list and I would > like it to appear at first position.
Herbert
-- http://TeXnik.de/ http://PSTricks.de/ ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/ http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?introduction=yes
