Sorry, wrong list! On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:37:06 +0200 Karsten Heymann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Gour, > > On Wed, 2 Jun 2004 13:15:07 +0200 > Gour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Karsten Heymann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > > The more "natural" Toolkit for LyX would be FLTK I think, because > > > it seems to be quite close to xforms. But that would have to be > > > done as well... > > > > Why do you think it is more 'natural'? > > > > Since LyX is going into GUI-independence territory, can we say that > > some toolkit is 'more natural'? > > <quote > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg60374.html> > > > Of course, if the xforms code were ported to FLTK, we could have > > two identical frontends. Then there might be a case to argue. > > Would that make sense (i.e. shipping code with two near identical > frontends)? I mean, do you want to include every frontend for which > you have volunteers? > As fltk is, as I understand it, more or less an improved xforms, I > would not mind if fltk played the Darwin game with xforms (though > xforms works well enough where I need it , i.e. on slow machines > like my old notebook). > > </quote> > > But maybe I'm wrong here, since I'm no programmer (only latex and > python, if that counts ;-) ) > > Karsten >
