Hello Helge,

Thanks for the reply

On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 09:04, Helge Hafting wrote:

> > 
> 
> I haven't gotten this to work myself, but this is supposed to work by 
> marking the stuff you don't want checked and changing it to some other
> language than the language used in your document.
> This doesn't work with ispell, but is supposed to work with aspell.

I am using a Debian binary which has a drop-down where I can select
ispell or aspell. However, I do not have a means under Layout/Paragraph
to select the language. Maybe this is only available if, as you said,
aspell is compiled-in as an option? By the way - the users guide
suggests this feature is only possible with pspell.

I shudder at the thought of messing with the pspell/ispell/aspell again
as I was trapped in a Spellchecker Dependancies Hell for weeks last year
after upgrading Ximian Evolution!
 
> 
> Four ways of working around this problem:
> 
> 1. Skipping code snippets manually - no changes to your documents.
> When ispell find the first bad word in code, terminate spellchecking.

Yup. Do that currently.

> 
> 2. Put code in separate documents
> In the main document, use insert->include file
> and specify "input" as the way of including the file containing lyxcode.

Ah! Thats a good idea. I shall try that. Though with a lot of ducuments
it might be tricky managing the files (particularly over many hosts).
> 
> 3. Consider the listings package.  Currently, that means using
> some latex, although support for this package is planned.
> (Latex code isn't spellchecked)

Sounds good. What is it?
> 
> 4. Take a look at the .tex file produced from a file containing lyx code.
> The lyxcode part isn't that difficult.  Write your code entirely in ERT
> instead of using lyxcode.  ERT isn't spellchecked, and you get 
> everything in a single document.
> 
This might just be the answer in the meantime. Copy the LyX-Code format
and re-implement in ERT.

Thanks for the suggestions.

Regards,

Iain.
-- 

Reply via email to