On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 06:57, Les Denham wrote:
> On Monday 28 October 2002 1349 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> 
> > I have a document that is confidential, and I will export it when
> > finished into postscript.
> >
> > I would then like to take the postscript and either put black boxes over
> > the confidential stuff or remove it. But what remains must be
> > pixel-accurate compared to the uncencored version - if possible.
> >
> The Gimp -- but it would be rather fiddly if you have a lot of black boxes to 
> put in.

Yes it would, and it wouldn't be something you could throw at a printer
and get optimal resolution etc. Plus storing it would suck =) I'd have
to carry it on CD if I rendered to 600 dpi times 60 pages =)

What I really want is to edit the PS file itself, and save as PS without
the text that was covered up - then I could post the result on the Web
without people accessing the hidden text from the PS.

It seems like such a simple request, too! I mean, I've seen people edit
PS by hand to move things in figures, but never to the scale I'm talking
about. But it should be possible...

> L. R. Denham
> ------------------------------------------
> Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
> See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
> 

BTW I read the link in your signature, and I agree. I'll make a similar
(identical?) signature for myself shortly.

Have fun,
Darren

Reply via email to