On Tue, 2002-10-29 at 06:57, Les Denham wrote: > On Monday 28 October 2002 1349 pm, Darren Freeman wrote: > > > I have a document that is confidential, and I will export it when > > finished into postscript. > > > > I would then like to take the postscript and either put black boxes over > > the confidential stuff or remove it. But what remains must be > > pixel-accurate compared to the uncencored version - if possible. > > > The Gimp -- but it would be rather fiddly if you have a lot of black boxes to > put in.
Yes it would, and it wouldn't be something you could throw at a printer and get optimal resolution etc. Plus storing it would suck =) I'd have to carry it on CD if I rendered to 600 dpi times 60 pages =) What I really want is to edit the PS file itself, and save as PS without the text that was covered up - then I could post the result on the Web without people accessing the hidden text from the PS. It seems like such a simple request, too! I mean, I've seen people edit PS by hand to move things in figures, but never to the scale I'm talking about. But it should be possible... > L. R. Denham > ------------------------------------------ > Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. > See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html > BTW I read the link in your signature, and I agree. I'll make a similar (identical?) signature for myself shortly. Have fun, Darren