> Why did you choos brazil2 instead of brazil.kmap? What's the
> difference in terms of ease of use? Are there of brazilian
> users out there who could comment?
OK, let's see the differences
In brazil.kmap we have:
\kmod ' acute aeioucAEIOUC
\kmod ` grave aA
\kmod ~ tilde aoAO
\kmod ^ circumflex eaoEAO
\kmod \" umlaut aeiouAEIOU
\kxmod acute c "\\c{c}"
\kxmod acute C "\\c{C}"
\kxmod acute i "\\'{\\i}"
and in brazil2.kmap we have:
\kmod ` grave aeiouAEIOU
\kmod ~ tilde aoAO
\kmod ^ circumflex eaoEAO
\kmod ' cedilla cC
\kxmod cedilla a "\\'{a}"
\kxmod cedilla A "\\'{A}"
\kxmod cedilla e "\\'{e}"
\kxmod cedilla E "\\'{E}"
\kxmod cedilla i "\\'{i}"
\kxmod cedilla I "\\'{I}"
\kxmod cedilla o "\\'{o}"
\kxmod cedilla O "\\'{O}"
\kxmod cedilla u "\\'{u}"
\kxmod cedilla U "\\'{U}"
and in both when I press ' + c = \'{c}
Thanks, Alexandre Gonçalves Jacarandá
--
_______________________________________________
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Email.com
http://www.email.com/?sr=signup
