Just for the record, it looks like the *product notation* is down too.
El dom, 6 abr 2025 a la(s) 10:41 p.m., Richard Kimberly Heck (
rikih...@gmail.com) escribió:
> On 4/6/25 4:37 PM, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 06, 2025 at 11:39:01AM -0500, T Rex wrote:
> >>
> >> Yes, I'll try that. What I'm asking more clearly is what is the LaTeX
> >> equivalent of "integrate(x,x)"? My problem is related to the syntax that
> >> lyx can recognize, I would just use "\int_0^{10} x\, dx" but it doesn't
> >> work.
> >
> > It should work, and indeed it works with lyx 2.3 but is apparently
> > broken in lyx 2.4.
> >
> > This is the corresponding output on the terminal:
> >
> > lyx 2.3
> > -------
> > use equation inset
> > use cell: [subsup [symbol int] [char 0 mathalpha] [char 1
> > mathalpha][char 0 mathalpha]][char x mathalpha][space 4] [char d
> > mathalpha][char x mathalpha]
> > checking expr: 'integrate( x , x ,0,10)'
> > calling: maxima
> > input: 'simpsum:true;tex(integrate( x , x ,0,10));'
> > output: '50'
> >
> > lyx-2.4
> > -------
> > use equation inset
> > use cell: [subsup [macro int] [char 0 mathalpha] [char 1
> > mathalpha][char 0 mathalpha]][char x mathalpha][space 4] [char d
> > mathalpha][char x mathalpha]
> > checking expr: 'intop[0]^(10) x dx'
> > calling: maxima
> > input: 'simpsum:true;tex(intop[0]^(10) x dx);'
> >
> >
> > So, in 2.3 the integral sign is interpreted as [symbol int] but in 2.4
> > as [macro int] and that seems to make the difference.
>
> I've forward this to Thibaut. I'll guess it has to do with some of his
> changes.
>
> Riki
>
>
>
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
https://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
