On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 02:28:50PM +0300, Udicoudco wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 11:04 AM Scott Kostyshak <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On 2023-06-10 21:49, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > > > > > > > > It's because the 'blackboard' font is quite limited (to ASCII caps, I > > > > think). If you type characters not present in that font, you get weird > > > > results. > > > > > > With modern math fonts (open type) the range of 'blackboard' > characters is wider, > and it includes small latin letters, and arabic numerals as well. > > > In this case, LyX creates the corresponding LaTeX code "$\mathbb{0}$", > > which is valid LaTeX. It is true that the output is counter-intuitive. I'm > > not convinced we should do anything here. > > With unicode-math, "$\mathbb{0}$" should be rendered as "𝟘" (U+1D7D8), > but it seems that LyX is not aware of that. Attached is an example. > Should I open > a ticket? I don't currently have access to my Linux machine, and can't > test it with master.
Interesting, that's good to know. I don't have Times New Roman on my system so I can't test. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
