Neither statement is helpful.
This most likely boilerplate that they send to everybody and
as we want to push Open Source use we should politely point them
towards the GLP2 license.
greetings, el
On 2022-05-03 08:50 , Alan Tyree wrote:
I agree with Steve on this. It's no part of the LyX team's business
to be interpreting the GPL2 or any other licence.
Cheers,
Alan
On Tue, 3 May 2022 at 15:33, Steve Litt <sl...@troubleshooters.com> wrote:
I wouldn't suggest replying to these guys. They're trying to put
the LyX project in the role of their lawyer, without payment.
Personally, I think the GPL2 is clear enough for me to stake my
business on, but if they have questions, they can hire a lawyer.
Or, if they don't like the project not acting as their lawyer,
they can start using a proprietary substitute, and REALLY start
paying lawyers.
SteveT
Service Centre Licensing said on Mon, 2 May 2022 04:45:07 +0000
>Dear LyX Team,
>
>
>
>We are writing to you in relation to the licensing for LyX.
[...]
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
