Am Mittwoch, dem 02.02.2022 um 16:47 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes via lyx-users: > The place where this pop() method is used (popLanguageName) is > related to our use of nested languages. And indeed, it does not check > that some language has been saved before pop-ing it.
But we check before all uses of popLanguageName() that lang_switch_depth_ (which is the stack<int> at stake here) is non-empty via langOpenedAtThisLevel(). So from the code, I don't see why that can happen. > At this point, having a document that triggers the issue would be > very useful. Then I am sure that Jürgen or Enrico will be able to > take over. Yes. Wolfgang, if you cannot share your document, you can make a copy of it and anonymize that via buffer-anonymize (in the minibuffer, i.e. after Alt-X). This function replaces all characters in your document with an "a". This will do for us ti debug. Jürgen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
