On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 01:38:18PM +0300, email.i...@gmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > I maintain a file with many macros which I use in all of my projects. > My projects usually differ in their layout (e.g., due to submitting to > different journals) so I commonly get a warning of mismatch between the > layout of the macros file and the layout of the project file.
Seems like a common workflow and I can see how that would be annoying. > Even after I silence the pop-up message I see a warning in the LyX log and > it causes the compilation to run much slower. The "much slower" part is surprising to me. It could be a bug in LyX. Could you please provide a minimal example where it runs much slower? > Is there a way to define the macros file to be layout-less (since it is not > a stand-alone file so I never compile it) or maybe define it to be of a > user-defined layout that will be compatible with any article layout I will > be using (of course, I guess I'll need to manually define and extend this > list of compatible layouts). Not that I know of but I think it's a good idea. We do have the concept of "no color" and "no language". You make a good argument in my opinion for something like "no class". A related idea we've discussed before in different contexts is the idea that child documents could share document settings of master documents. In this case, you want the child document to inherit the document class of the master document. This is not implemented yet, but there are a few different use cases we would want that general framework. Best, Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- lyx-users mailing list lyx-users@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
