On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 11:04:28AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 3/26/20 10:31 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 09:50:53AM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > >>> Thank you for your responses. I can't say I fully understand why Lyx > >>> needs to be as it is; I'm generally against hard coded parameters. > >> We are as well, and I don't entirely know why it is done this way. It > >> could be worth raising on lyx-devel. > > Git points to 9b13535e778b9 > > PDFOptions.cpp: add two hyperref options for better compatibility for > > non-latin titles, etc. > > > > It might have been wrong to hardcode it this way, anyway we can't just drop > > it > > from compatibility reasons now. But adding new unicode option to the dialog > > (by > > default on) seems correct solution. > > I don't have time to write the patch though. > > I can find the time, probably. > > Should we do something more general and allow custom options to be set? > I.e., output no options ourselves in that case? > > Riki
I am not sure what more general case you have in mind. We already have Additional options. If someone is super picky he can always write exact commands in Preamble... I would just add unicode option set to true by default. Pavel -- lyx-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
