I sympathize with those who need auto correction. For myself:
* I'm decent with touch typing
* However, when typing on "cheap" keyboards, I do more mistakes... some 
keyboards may fail to register a key stroke if hit slightly off center

However, I have become very sceptical towards auto correction based on 
experience with Word+Outlook and smartphones...
* Word tries to auto detect language, and does a poor job - resulting in 
numerous problems
* I have tried to tailor make Office auto correction, but my settings often 
have been reset the next time I use the tool, or after upgrades.
* Auto correction may introduce bad mistakes that I sometimes don't see... my 
smartphone once auto-changed the name of an ice cream chain to the Spanish word 
for one-night stand in a communication in Spanish... which was not taken well...
* I often use technical words that are not in the dictionary; auto correction 
would then be disastrous.

So, for me, auto-correction would be a total turn-off unless I could turn it 
off, and *know* that my setting was not changed by "the system".

I would rather live with my few mistakes, than use a system that introduce 
arbitrary mistakes that were not intended.

B

Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

________________________________
From: lyx-users@lists.lyx.org <lyx-users@lists.lyx.org> on behalf of Ricardo 
Berlasso <rgb.m...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2018 2:08:55 PM
To: LyX Users
Subject: Re: auto fixing mispelled words

Sorry for jumping into the discussion, but I think some people here are missing 
the real point of the problem

El dom., 4 nov. 2018 a las 12:47, Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan (the best Daniel of 
the bunch) (<daniel....@oeconomist.com<mailto:daniel....@oeconomist.com>>) 
escribió:
On 11/4/18 1:18 AM, Pol wrote:
>
> Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan (the best Daniel of the bunch) wrote:
>
> Yes, a set of specific words to be fixed by rearranging letters.

No.  The computer would not _rearrange_ letters.  It would effect a
string subsitution, oblivious to whether any of the letters in the
replacement string appeared in the original string.

> E.g.  writing quickly it often happens to write 'informazioen' rather than
> ' informazione'.
> Sometimes that word appears correctly on the screen, sometimes it is
> distorted like that, as an anagram of the right word.

It doesn't just happen.  The screen displays what you entered.

> Is that mistake a matter of 'learning'?

Yes, unequivocally.

Not necessarily. There are several forms of mild dyslexia in which the person 
swaps letters or even "fingers" (typing an "o" instead of an "a," for example). 
I know this from experience because I have the problem. And yes, working hard 
and being attentive solves many (not all, mind you) of the "accidents," but 
still... I've been writing in computers almost every day for the last 30 years 
and still have many silly "typos:" in my case it's not a matter of practice.

And that's just a first point. An autocorrect tool can also be useful for 
people without those problems: As a matter of fact, LyX actually perform an 
autocorrect every time it changes two dashes into an en-dash and three into an 
em-dash. Maybe this feature could be generalized. Think of changing the first 
character of a phrase into caps, for example, or setting a substitution pattern 
to change a couple of characters into a symbol or a longer text you need to 
insert several times in the document. It doesn't need to be something fixed (in 
fact, it shouldn't!), just a table that any user can fill at will: first 
column, what you want to substitute, second column, the substitution, and then 
the system perform those changes in real time. LibreOffice has such tool and 
yes, most of the elements in their default table are just a list of stupid 
emojis, but that does not mean the feature is stupid.

Just my two cents!

Regards,
Ricardo




> You mean that i should gain a
> better motor control of my fingers' movements?

Typing is a learned skill, involving multiple processes.  I don't know
(or much care) which process you've not properly learned.

> My guess is that my mind form the mispelled word, while quickly
> writing, because  'informazioen' and ' informazione' are the same, in
> my mind.

In that case, you need to learn otherwise.

> There would be much to say about the meaning of 'learning', but this is
> not the right place to discuss about that. I do not know which aspects
> of learning would be involved here, but i am puzzled about how to
> improve my writing by learning.

If it's truly a matter of your not understanding the difference
between “informazioen” and “informazione”, then you need to look into
how better to learn orthography.

> Anyway, that kind of mispelling happens often. Should i spend years to
> learn, hoping ti improve my typewriting ability?

If necessary.  But most adults wouldn't need years.

> Rather, it would be very convenient to see that kind of mistakes
> instantly corrected.

I am again very much reminded of Cyril Kornbluth's story.

> Don't you agree?

Obviously I don't agree.  You shouldn't even have asked whether I agree.
  • Re: auto fixing misp... Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan (the best Daniel of the bunch)
    • Re: auto fixing... Pol
      • Re: auto fi... Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan (the best Daniel of the bunch)
        • Re: aut... paolo m.
          • Re:... Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan (the best Daniel of the bunch)
            • ... Pol
              • ... Michael Berger
              • ... Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan (the best Daniel of the bunch)
              • ... Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan (the best Daniel of the bunch)
              • ... Ricardo Berlasso
              • ... Bernt Lie
              • ... Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan (the best Daniel of the bunch)
              • ... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
              • ... Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan (the best Daniel of the bunch)
              • ... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
              • ... Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan (the best Daniel of the bunch)
              • ... Ricardo Berlasso
              • ... Daniel Kian Mc Kiernan (the best Daniel of the bunch)
  • Re: auto fixing misp... Paul A. Rubin

Reply via email to