On Mon, 14 May 2018 06:58:30 +0000 Baris Erkus <bariser...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On 13-May-18 3:16 PM, Bernt Lie wrote: > 1: I agree, and I didn't say so. Essentially, my point is that > developers can not do that without compromising its OS agnostics. For > various reasons, I use Windows myself. And I have full respect for > others making different choices. I don't think the LyX list should be > used for negative description of OSes not used by oneself. > > 2: I see the point. If there are no negative side effects of > upgrading to the latest version of MikTeX, I'd do the following: > * Put in a LyX 2.3.0 installation link. > * Start by checking if the latest MikTeX version is installed. If > yes, proceed and install LyX 2.3.0 > * If not, explain why, and point to a link (youtube, or whatever) on > how the user can upgrade MikTeX and say "retry after you have > upgraded MikTeX". > > Maybe a solution? > B Your plan outlined in point #2 above seems like a great idea to me. Disclaimer: I don't use Windows, so I might not know the full extent of the problem. SteveT
