On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 12:49:53AM +0300, edu Gpl wrote: > After i upgrade from lyx 2.2.2 to 2.3
Dear edu, Please always specify that you mean 2.3.0alpha1-1 (or a custom-compiled 2.3.0dev), because the final release of 2.3.0 will be significantly different. Thank you very much for testing 2.3.0alpha1-1. It's very useful to us because although developers are testing it, no one except you is testing with Arabic so you might be able to catch bugs that no one else will. > tcolorbox not work in the title of > chapter if i used it with arabic language, but work with english language. > please see attachments files. Your arabic .lyx file that you attached is in 2.3.0alpha1-1 format. So I cannot test with 2.2.x. I exported to 2.2.x format but when I did that and compiled with 2.2.x it worked the same as with 2.3.0alpha1-1. Can you send the 2.2.x format version that compiles correctly with 2.2.x but that does not compile correctly with 2.3.0alpha1-1? Also, when you say "upgrade" above, it makes me think that you are using 2.3.0alpha1-1 as your only LyX version, which makes me a little nervous since it is a development version intended only for testing (I'm sorry for not making this clear in the announcement). Thanks, Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
