[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>Note that the address is the publisher's address, not the location of
>the conference. I suggest to put the conference location in the title.
Interesting. My technique has been to give proceedings references in two
parts, one for the book itself, and one for the article within it. An example
is:
@inproceedings{dgv:wkidea,
crossref = {crypto:93},
author = {Daemen, Joan and Govaerts, Ren{\'{e}} and Vandewalle, Joos},
title = {Weak Keys for {IDEA}},
annote = {Discovery of a class of chosen-plaintext weak IDEA keys},
pages = {224--231}
}
@proceedings{crypto:93,
editor = {Stinson, Douglas R.},
title = {Advances in Cryptology---{CRYPTO} '93},
booktitle = {Advances in Cryptology---{CRYPTO} '93},
volume = {773},
series = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science},
publisher = {Springer-Verlag, 1994},
address = {Santa Barbara, CA},
month = Aug # {~22--26,},
year = {1993},
isbn = {3-540-57766-1}
}
You may notice that my practice has been to use the address, month and year
fields of the book entry to refer to the conference, to depend upon the
publisher's name without an address to identify it uniquely, and to list the
copyright year with the publisher's name if it is different from the year of
the conference.
Apparently, I'm out-of-step. If the address field should apply to the
publisher, should the month field be scrapped and the year field give the year
of publication instead of the year of the conference? Also, can anyone
enlighten me as to the pitfalls associated with my past practice?
--
M/S 258-5 | 1024-bit PGP fingerprint: | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NASA Ames Research Center | 41 B0 89 0A 8F 94 6C 59 | (650) 604-4416
Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000 | 7C 80 10 20 25 C7 2F E6 | FAX: (650) 604-4377
We each earn what freedom of speech we defend for those who most offend us.
