John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 13 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | 6.2 may not have new enough versions of these programs. tetex and latex
| > | don't change so frequently, but you'll probably need to download and
| > | install the latest versions of xforms and libforms. rpmfind.net is good
| > | for finding obscure libraries, or if you have a package manager that
| > | supports this (e.g. kpackage) just point it at an FTP site and install
| > | direct from there. Whatever you do, don't attempt to solve the problem
| > | by upgrading to RH 7.0 - it's the Windows ME of the Linux world!
| >
| > prttthh... I really do not understand why everybody is bashing RH 7.0.
| >
| > It is working perfectly fine.
| >
| > Lgb
|
| it is you who criticised RH's compiler version decision ! :)
a long time ago. now I belive that this really has pushed C++ support
forward.
| yes, it generally works ok if you have the latest packages. One trick
| with older C++ programs is to build C++ packages like :
|
| CC=kgcc CXX=kgcc CXXFLAGS=-L/usr/lib
nononono then you completely loose the much better C++ compiler in
2.96.
| You can look at the spec file in the src.rpm of the kde* stuff to see how its
| done.
only because qt/kde is lagging behind C++-wise
Lgb
